This matter should have unquestionably been referred to a special prosecutor. And of course, the answer is, Yes, we do. I think it's really important what was raised by the Attorney General, and that is we have these allegations without specificity. Amendola suggests, could have possibly defended this case of this magnitude with the time limitations put on by the court. Amendola correctly said that whatever no lawyer, Mr. Amendola 12,000 pages of discovery several weeks before the trial, they petitioned the court to withdraw, stating that we can't possibly defend effectively and it would be a violation of the rules of Professional Conduct to proceed and they wanted to withdraw and the judge said no, and so they went to trial. Romminger, before the trial they had received according to Mr. You actually had a situation which was very unusual Mr. And it we detail in our motion, the timing of this trial and how significant that was. It's been our position throughout this matter, there are so many things that went wrong in this particular case, but of all the things that went wrong, it was this rush to trial. One of the disturbing aspects of the diary and the other i nvestigation that we've just done is how this matter was rushed to trial. The question, one of the issues that came out, when you say that the evidence is so overwhelming.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |